Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-03-15-Speech-4-229-500"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-03-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120315.19.4-229-500"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-03-15-Speech-4-230-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Catherine Grèze2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; REGI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mercosur countries (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Europe Écologie (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; DEVE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"The message that the European Parliament is trying to send by adopting this report is that we are all prepared to endorse the Commission’s major long-term commitments in the area of climate policy. I clearly support the EU’s strong ambition and hope that Parliament sends a positive signal about the climate. I cannot, however, support instruments which are bad for climate, social and economic policy While I am well aware that we have a different way of making policy at European level compared with national level, as there is often the need to seek compromises, I cannot bring myself to vote in favour of a text that peddles the myth of nuclear energy and clean coal. The lesson we learned from the Copenhagen Resolution, which we all remember, is still at the forefront of our minds. That is why I did not vote in favour of this Roadmap which mentions nuclear energy as an instrument for moving to a competitive low-carbon economy in 2050."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph