Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-02-16-Speech-4-147-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-02-16"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120216.23.4-147-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-02-16-Speech-4-148-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Frank Vanhecke2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2011-11-09--2014-06-30)3 member; DEVE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair_member_of_the_bureau; EFD (2011-11-09--2014-06-30)3 substitute; CONT (2012-01-19--2013-02-26)3 member; DROI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Onafhankelijk (2011-12-06--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, when it comes to these guidelines for the 2013 budget, we have, unfortunately, gone no further than a few generalities about ‘responsibility and restraint in budgetary matters’. In that regard, we have scored a big fat zero. We should have come up with specific proposals which would stop all the European institutions throwing taxpayers’ money out of the window. A EUR 50 million investment and EUR 11 million annual operating costs for a House of European History, on top of the EUR 21 million we have already spent on our Parliamentarium, our visitor centre? That is indefensible. Travel expenses of up to EUR 26 000 for each participating Member of Parliament? That is indefensible. A high-end film prize that no one is the slightest bit interested in, but which costs EUR 570 000 annually? That is indefensible. Subsidies for European political parties which will total EUR 30 million this year alone? That is indefensible. I could cite another 100 such examples. That is a scandal."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph