Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-02-14-Speech-2-277-000"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20120214.18.2-277-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
". I would like some clarification from George Lyon. He appears to be saying that, beyond 2013, the matter would need to come under social policy and therefore, as far as I understand it, it is a matter for Member States as they are responsible for social policy. I would just like to point out to him that in voting for the six pack and then maybe the two pack, in the current economic situation, it will be impossible for Member States to pursue a social policy because some Commission officials oppose an increase in social spending, because limiting spending is all they know. We are just passing the buck to Member States who will be unable to carry out social policy. I would like to draw his attention to this matter and I would like him to tell me if that is what he meant or whether he thinks we need to address this issue in the budget for social cohesion in Europe? I look forward to hearing his response."@en1
lpv:videoURI

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph