Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-02-14-Speech-2-185-375"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20120214.15.2-185-375"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
The interconnection of business registers is a measure that is to be welcomed, as the aim is to create a platform that can improve and accelerate communications and data acquisition for citizens and businesses. This will promote the integration of the economic area within the EU and increase legal certainty for businesses and citizens. However, business registers across the different Member States of the European Union differ in many ways, two examples being their legal significance and the reliability of the data they contain. It goes without saying that growing cross-border economic activity makes the interconnection of business registers necessary for reasons of legal certainty and transparency. The directive aims only to interconnect existing national registers on a purely technical basis, not to harmonise their legal consequences. Only the exchange of register data is regulated – no commercial register is to be set up with its own data. For me, the interconnection of business registers can only succeed if the Commission and the Member States work more closely together. In my book, a large part of the proposal, in particular in relation to questions concerning technical details, was unable to provide adequate answers. Questions – as well as solutions – must emerge hand-in-hand with the establishment of the network and then be developed further. There are still a number of open questions to be resolved, and I therefore abstained from the vote."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples