Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-02-02-Speech-4-292-750"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-02-02"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"cs"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120202.31.4-292-750"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-02-02-Speech-4-292-8752
lpv:speaker	lp:Edvard Kožušník2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; JURI (2012-01-25--2014-06-30)3 member; PECH (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; IMCO (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; DEVE (2012-01-25--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Občanská demokratická strana (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"I would like first to state my reticence in relation to exporting the American practice of actions targeting collective redress into EU law. I am particularly concerned about the abuse of these class actions. It is also not entirely clear what impacts the creation of such arrangements would have on the law of individual Member States. On the other hand, introduction of this practice might increase consumer protection and have a preventative effect against some unfair practices on the internal market. Despite my reticence, I voted in favour of the report, as I am expecting an assessment of the impact of the legal measure to be drawn up on the basis of the report. Only on the basis of a high-quality assessment of the impact and the benefits and risks of the practice of collective redress will it be possible to decide whether there is any sense in incorporating this practice into EU law or definitively rejecting it."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph