Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-12-15-Speech-4-252-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-12-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20111215.23.4-252-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-12-15-Speech-4-252-1252
lpv:speaker	lp:Oreste Rossi2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2012-02-01)3 member; ENVI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; BUDG (2009-10-07--2012-01-18)3 substitute; IMCO (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 unknown; Lega Nord (2009-07-14--2013-03-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with Japan (2009-09-16--2012-02-14)3 member; EFD (2009-07-14--2013-06-11)3
lpv:translated text	"I abstained in the vote because, while I share its objective, the report does not take into account problems that in the long term could compromise the construction of sections of railway that are considered to be important. As far as Italy is concerned, the main problem relates to the national railway company which is showing little interest, probably because it holds an almost complete monopoly over the railways. It has been proposed to increase the authority of the private coordinators and the European Commission, in order to force public bodies not in favour, like to consent to the requirements of the TEN-T projects and their coordinators. Such a choice would means interfering with Member States’ national sovereignty. The very positive part of the text is the choice to definitively liberalise the railways, which would end the effective monopoly holds in Italy. As the railway network operator and train service provider are both owned by they effectively have a monopoly over the Italian railway network, to the detriment of other operators, and consequently of free competition."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph