Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-12-14-Speech-3-419-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-12-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Single European transport area (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20111214.28.3-419-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-12-14-Speech-3-420-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Michael Cramer2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-10-07--2014-06-30)3 member; TRAN (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with South Africa (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, Ms Stassen, you said that railways are given preferential treatment. Do you know that railways have to pay for all their energy consumption, they have to pay for fuel for diesel locomotives and that air transport is exempt from this, amounting to EUR 30 billion every year? Do you know that on the railways, there is a mandatory rail toll for every locomotive for every kilometre of track that a train covers with no upper limit, whereas on the roads it is entirely up to the Member States whether any road toll is collected at all? This mostly applies only on motorways for lorries above 12 tonnes and it is also capped. Therefore, do you continue to maintain this? Who is subsidised here then? Why can pupils and students take intercity flights for the same price as a short taxi journey, but travelling by rail is two to three times more expensive, and the state pockets the VAT to boot? Could you say something about this and still maintain your assertion?"@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph