Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-12-14-Speech-3-310-921"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-12-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"cs"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20111214.22.3-310-921"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-12-14-Speech-3-310-9292
lpv:speaker	lp:Jan Březina2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the EU-Armenia, EU-Azerbaijan and EU-Georgia Parliamentary Cooperation Committees (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; REGI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Křesťanská a demokratická unie - Československá strana lidová (2009-07-14--2013-06-01)3 member; ITRE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:translated text	"I welcome the Commission’s communication ‘on the EU’s counter-terrorism policy: main achievements and future challenges’, and I would like to emphasise that the communication must be linked to the EU’s forthcoming internal security strategy. I consider it an error, however, that its scope is rather narrow, is limited to the implementation of agreed policy measures, and does not cover national counter-terrorism policies or national measures that transpose policies agreed at European or international level. I also regret the fact that there has not been a more thorough investigation of possible legal loopholes or the possible overlapping or duplication of counter-terrorism actions and instruments adopted at EU level. Unfortunately, the communication does not sufficiently cover and develop in greater detail the measures taken by Directorates General other than Justice, Freedom and Security (such as the Mobility and Transport, Enterprise and Industry or Internal Market and Services Directorates General) and it does not give a clear idea as to how the measures interact and where there are overlaps or gaps. It is also necessary for all the above levels to be considered, as European, national and international measures are complementary, and the assessment of individual measures does not provide a complete picture of the impact of counter-terrorism policies in Europe. The European Commission also owes EU citizens an explanation as to how certain EU counter-terrorism instruments, such as data retention, passenger name records and the Swift Agreement, for example, fit into the EU counter-terrorism strategy."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph