Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-12-14-Speech-3-244-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-12-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20111214.22.3-244-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-12-14-Speech-3-245-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Raül Romeva i Rueda2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Iniciativa per Catalunya Verds (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; PECH (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2009-09-16--2013-04-17)3 member; FEMM (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 vice-chair; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2012-01-31)3 substitute; LIBE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2009-09-16--2012-02-12)3
lpv:translated text	"Against. The members of the Greens/European Free Alliance welcome the result of the vote (326 votes against the agreement and 296 in favour). After months of tense and complex negotiations, deliberations and debates, under significant pressure from some governments, such as the governments of Morocco and Spain, Parliament has finally responded coherently and correctly by rejecting this agreement. If we had supported the agreement, we would have infringed international law and trampled all over the rights of the Sahrawi people. We voted against the resolution on three fronts: legal, ecological and economic. Legally, Morocco was negotiating with resources that do not belong to it as Western Sahara is an occupied territory and, consequently, the agreement ignores the rights of the Sahrawi people, thereby infringing international law. Ecologically, fisheries agreements should be based on stocks with surpluses, whereas the stocks in that area suffer from overfishing. Economically, the profitability of this agreement has proven to be the worst of all such agreements and it is a waste of European money."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph