Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-12-13-Speech-2-605-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-12-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Use of phosphates and other phosphorous compounds in household laundry detergents (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20111213.35.2-605-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-12-13-Speech-2-606-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Carl Schlyter2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Miljöpartiet de gröna (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; INTA (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the Cariforum — EU Parliamentary Committee (2010-09-08--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; ENVI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I think the Commissioner misunderstood what I said. What I said was: I do not think that REACH is the best way to evaluate the alternatives. I was not speaking about phosphates; I was talking about the alternatives. It says in the recital that it should be used to evaluate the alternatives. I question the validity of REACH to do so, because so far, we have not restricted one single substance using the REACH system. So that was my question: if it is really appropriate and if it will work."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Carl Schlyter (Verts/ALE )."1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph