Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-12-01-Speech-4-325-906"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-12-01"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20111201.35.4-325-906"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-12-01-Speech-4-325-9092
lpv:speaker	lp:Willy Meyer2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of the Andean Community (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Izquierda Unida (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; AFET (2011-10-05--2012-01-18)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; DROI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 vice-chair; PETI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; LIBE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:translated text	"I voted against this instrument, because although I realise that we are voting on the conciliation procedure, which Parliament wants the power to oversee, we must not overlook the content of the instrument. I have always been very critical of this instrument, because the European Union has used and continues to use the subject of human rights to pursue a policy of interference in third countries. The EU can use this instrument to finance political parties, foundations and even individual people in any third country of its choice, without any authorisation from the target country. Thus, we have seen how it has been used since 2006, the year in which it was created, to finance destabilising groups in certain countries in Latin America."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph