Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-12-01-Speech-4-320-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-12-01"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20111201.35.4-320-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-12-01-Speech-4-321-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Patrice Tirolien2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; REGI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Parti socialiste (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; DEVE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2012-09-12)3 member; Delegation to the Cariforum — EU Parliamentary Committee (2010-06-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"This DCI/BAM text brushes aside the mandate that was given to Parliament’s negotiating team, which was to observe the spirit and the letter of the Treaty of Lisbon, to place Parliament on an equal footing with the Council in all programming decisions relating to the choice of strategic priorities and financial allocations, and not to set a negative precedent for Parliament prior to the forthcoming negotiations on the future external aid financing instruments 2014-2020. By applying Article 291 TFEU on strategic programming decisions, Parliament’s power of scrutiny will be more limited than it was with the comitology procedure under the old Treaty. All this is a result of the shameful blackmail by the Council, which was threatening to block the entire package of measures if Parliament rejected any one of the four texts that were voted on. I therefore voted against this text, because our Parliament had a duty to defend its rights as set out in the Treaty of Lisbon, whilst demonstrating that its plenary remained sovereign in the face of the Council’s efforts at destabilisation."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph