Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-11-16-Speech-3-256-250"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20111116.18.3-256-250"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"In the discussions on this resolution the French Senate asserts that the principles of subsidiarity were breached. The national parliaments must always be alert during the legislative process. There are already two similar instruments: UNESCO’s world heritage list and the Council of Europe’s European Cultural Itinerary. Why do we need more of the same? The aim of the European Heritage Label is to draw attention to places and sites and their symbolic value for Europe. Attention will be focused on publicising and providing more detailed information about their European significance and on organised educational activities for young people.
The time has come to draw attention again to the importance of religious heritage in shaping the European consciousness. Labelling is above all an instrument for transplanting national awareness through local heritage and is associated with the European significance of a particular site. If we want to get out of officially supporting our Christian roots, religious sites and buildings should also be labelled. When it comes to the Vendée or Spišské Podhradie, monasteries, churches, towers and cemeteries, all of these shape the way people think and characterise a country. In addition they preserve the values, ideals and symbols of the peoples they belong to."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples