Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-11-15-Speech-2-434-814"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20111115.27.2-434-814"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"I voted against this report and the other two reports (Březina Α7-0340/2011 and Březina Α7-0358/2011), because not only do they fail to promote solutions that aim to abolish nuclear energy; on the contrary, they assume it will be used and that research into it will be funded. There are numerous problematic points in all three reports, such as, for example, in connection with funding and the participation of the private sector in general in subsidising research, but that is not my main comment. The main reason I voted against the report is because I am opposed to nuclear energy in principle. Unfortunately, the report reproduces the distorted perception of the usefulness of nuclear energy for economic reasons and in combating climate change. It maintains that more public funding is needed for basic nuclear research. It also advocates the need for the Union to ‘lead the way’ in this sector. However, the funding needed, especially in these times of crisis, is funding for sustainable growth based on renewable sources, which is truly compatible with environmental and social needs."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples