Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-11-15-Speech-2-434-660"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-11-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20111115.27.2-434-660"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-11-15-Speech-2-434-6572
lpv:speaker	lp:Andreas Mölzer2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; AFCO (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; NA (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; AFET (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"The management of the ITER nuclear research reactor indicated as early as 2009 that the costs of the ITER reactor could rise by as much as 100%. The original Euratom funding provided as part of the Seventh EU Research Framework Programme would not have been sufficient for the ITER reactor. Estimates indicate that the construction costs for ITER will amount to EUR 6.6 billion. According to these estimates, the contribution from the Euratom budget would be around EUR 5.3 billion and France would provide about EUR 1.3 billion. Therefore, in order to accommodate the current disparity of EUR 2.15 billion, the Euratom budget must be increased by around EUR 3.15 billion to make a total of approximately EUR 5.3 billion. The extent to which cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) should be increased is extremely dubious, given its proposals for Fukushima, which involved, for example, lowering the radiation figures. Furthermore, there are no future-proof nuclear power plants. Therefore, I am forced to reject this report in the strongest possible terms."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph