Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-11-15-Speech-2-434-603"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20111115.27.2-434-603"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"I am focusing on the first two points of this report: simplification for citizens and improvement of existing standards. These define the rapporteur’s approach to the revision of Directive 2005/36/EC on professions. Simplifications are not always positive. When the action that determines them consists of a generalised removal of pre-existing defensive norms, the repercussions can be more damaging than the causes we are trying to eradicate. The free circulation of services and people represents, I would say, the most important part of the package of freedom to promote a common market. It seemed natural to propose that we take into account any relevant differences which still exist between the 27 national systems. Unfortunately, amendments to that effect have all been rejected. The intention was to anticipate, initially, the acceleration of processes for the homogenisation of training systems and equivalence of qualifications, as well as the reworking of orders and regulations on determining professional fees, with a view to protecting civil rights and liberties and not opposing competition. This path has led me to the decision not to support Ms McClarkin’s proposal."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples