Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-11-15-Speech-2-434-206"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-11-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"lv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20111115.27.2-434-206"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-11-15-Speech-2-434-1932
lpv:speaker	lp:Alexander Mirsky2
lpv:spokenAs	member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-10-07--2014-06-30)3 substitute; REGI (2009-09-07--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Belarus (2009-09-16--2013-03-19)3 member; AFET (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 unknown; - (2010-04-12--2012-01-01)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"This report asks the Commission to come up with one or more legislative initiatives relating to an EU corporate insolvency framework. The S&D achieved two objectives: firstly, it adopted in the Committee on Legal Affairs technical amendments whereby we ask the Commission to come up with a clear definition of ‘COMI’ (centre of main interest) for groups of companies and, in relation to that, rules for a shift in COMI or substantive consolidation, in order to identify the legitimate jurisdiction for main and secondary proceedings. Secondly, it provided a bridge between Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 and Directive 2008/94/EC on the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employers. I totally support the report because in it, Parliament calls on the Commission to introduce a ranking of creditors that should give precedence to employees and set minimum standards of protection irrespective of different legal definitions for the categories concerned and substantive national laws."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Alexander Mirsky (S&D ),"1 "in writing."1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph