Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-10-27-Speech-4-202-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-10-27"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20111027.17.4-202-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-10-27-Speech-4-202-5002
lpv:speaker	lp:Raül Romeva i Rueda2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Iniciativa per Catalunya Verds (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; PECH (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2009-09-16--2013-04-17)3 member; FEMM (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 vice-chair; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2012-01-31)3 substitute; LIBE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2009-09-16--2012-02-12)3
lpv:translated text	". − In favour. The proposal from the Commission for the recasting of the original Directive 2004/83/EC forms part of the move towards a Common European Asylum Policy by 2012. In the case of the original Directive, the European Parliament was only consulted. Now, following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the Parliament is in a position of co-decision. The proposal now being put to plenary is the result of six informal trilogues, hopefully resulting in a first reading agreement. The existing Directive has two key elements: the grounds on which someone qualifies for refugee status or subsidiary protection and the content of that protection in terms of residence, employment and social rights within the Member State responsible for protection. The Commission brought forward the recasting proposal (Directive COM(2009) 551 final 2) as a result of the required review of the earlier Directive and developing jurisprudence. It is clear that there are considerable variations in practice between Member States in their implementation of the current Directive. This leads to wide variation in recognition rates overall and risks the continuation of secondary movements of applicants."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Raül Romeva i Rueda (Verts/ALE ),"1 "in writing"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph