Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-10-25-Speech-2-362-750"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-10-25"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20111025.25.2-362-750"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-10-25-Speech-2-362-8752
lpv:speaker	lp:Paulo Rangel2
lpv:spokenAs	vice-chair; EPP (2009-11-25--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-30--2014-06-30)3,3 member; AFCO (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 unknown; Partido Social Democrata (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; JURI (2010-10-20--2012-01-18)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Public procurement legislation is one of the areas where Union law intervention is felt most, and where it has the longest tradition, since it is celebrating the 40th anniversary of its first legislative intervention this year. This is an area where any intervention capable of Union law could have results beneficial to the economy. It benefits not just freedom of competition, but also the taxpayer in general, since it makes the central framework for processing public procurement transparent. However, the highly technical nature of this field has been increasing so-called ‘transaction costs’; in other words, the costs that applicants have to bear in a public procurement process – for example, legal advice – in order to submit an application. The future of this legislation must, therefore, involve simplification. In relation to another area, this path is also justified since it ensures a greater increase in flexibility: instead of the primacy of the best price, the best solution will win. I voted in favour because I agree with this vision."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph