Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-10-12-Speech-3-087-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-10-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Preparation for the European Council meeting (23 October 2011) (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20111012.14.3-087-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-10-12-Speech-3-088-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Elisa Ferreira2
lpv:spokenAs	member; ECON (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with India (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; TRAN (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Partido Socialista (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, Commissioner, I would congratulate the Commission on apparently coming out with positive momentum, but, as everyone knows, this depends on actions and not words, and on knowing the details of what they are going to do. I am referring, in particular, to an issue that was also raised by Ms Berès. When we were negotiating the revision of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), we were aware that the Commission’s proposal was more demanding than the one that we had before. We agreed that there should be a series of fines; part of Parliament was against it, as you know, but we agreed. These fines were considered excessive by the Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament, but there was an agreement with the Commission. How is it possible that, immediately after the approval of this balancing for the ‘six-pack’ by Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the Commission has tabled a proposal to cut all the Structural Funds, in addition to the penalties provided for in the ‘six-pack’ to punish countries that need to converge in order to comply because they have breached, probably not because they wanted to, but because they could not avoid it, the terms of the revised SGP? I would be much obliged if you would answer this question."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph