Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-09-29-Speech-4-100-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-09-29"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Security scanners (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110929.5.4-100-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-09-29-Speech-4-101-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Eva Lichtenberger2
lpv:spokenAs	member; TRAN (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2011-12-12)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Die Grünen - Die Grüne Alternative (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; JURI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, Commissioner, you said that you had respected Parliament’s resolution. That is true as regards the issue of X-rays and as regards requiring airports to use such technology on individuals. Now I move on to the weaknesses of comitology, however. As regards the blurred naked images, which we discussed and which we clearly wanted to exclude, you have demanded – for competition reasons or in order to secure competition – that these slightly blurred images should be acceptable. I ask myself and I ask you: who is dictating in Europe? Do we give priority to competition or do we give priority to privacy? Who is dictating here? Who are you trying to favour by not clearly following Parliament’s resolution? Normally, when it comes to technical matters, we go with the best available technology, not give the dinosaurs in the market who do not want to change the right to carry on forever. The reliability of the equipment has been questioned and I really have to ask myself here whether a completely wrong decision has been made in this area."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph