Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-09-27-Speech-2-463-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-09-27"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110927.26.2-463-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-09-27-Speech-2-463-5002
lpv:speaker	lp:Raül Romeva i Rueda2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Iniciativa per Catalunya Verds (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; PECH (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2009-09-16--2013-04-17)3 member; FEMM (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 vice-chair; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2012-01-31)3 substitute; LIBE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2009-09-16--2012-02-12)3
lpv:translated text	"In favour. This report originates in a request by the Conference of Committee Chairs addressed to the Constitutional Affairs Committee in order to clarify the position of Parliament as regards the meaning and legal status of unilateral statements entered in the minutes of Council meetings. Several committee chairs expressed their concerns about the proliferation of such statements, in particular, in the framework of the codecision procedure where they could weaken the legal force and scope of the adopted acts, and so possibly affect Parliament’s will as a colegislator. It has to be stressed in this regard that the contentious statements are mainly originating from one or several Member States, since they are in charge of the transposition of legislative acts at national level. An attempt to interpret those acts in a way that could diverge from the result achieved by common agreement of the two legislators would indeed undermine the necessary coherence of the application of Union law."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Raül Romeva i Rueda (Verts/ALE ),"1 "in writing."1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph