Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-09-27-Speech-2-458-093"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-09-27"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"lt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110927.26.2-458-093"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-09-27-Speech-2-458-1252
lpv:speaker	lp:Zigmantas Balčytis2
lpv:spokenAs	member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Lietuvos socialdemokratų partija (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; CONT (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; ITRE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; TRAN (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:translated text	"This report originates in a request by the Conference of Presidents addressed to the Committee on Constitutional Affairs to clarify the position of Parliament as regards the meaning and legal status of unilateral statements entered in the minutes of Council meetings. The contentious statements mainly originate from one or several Member States because they are in charge of the transposition of legislative acts at national level. An attempt to interpret those acts in a way which could be divergent from the result achieved by common agreement of the two legislators would indeed undermine the necessary coherence of application of Union legal acts. The case-law of the Court of Justice confirms that we cannot rely on such unilateral statements when it comes to interpreting a Union legal act. It can only be used to this end where reference is made to its content in the wording of the relevant act. I agree that unilateral statements by Member States regarding legal acts should not be published in the Official Journal of the European Union."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph