Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-09-27-Speech-2-097-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-09-27"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110927.5.2-097-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-09-27-Speech-2-098-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Ska Keller2
lpv:spokenAs	member; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2009-09-16--2012-02-05)3 unknown; Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; LIBE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; DEVE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:translated text	"Two weeks ago, the plenary held a vote on the Doha resolution, in which the amendments of the ALDE Group were rejected. Those ALDE amendments were the very reflection of the position of DG TRADE, namely, to regard any kind of LDC package delivery at the December WTO Ministerial as a mere down payment and to ask WTO members to agree on a road map for reaching agreement on all outstanding Doha issues. Instead, Parliament’s resolution gives a clear message to close up the Doha negotiations now in order to pave the way for WTO reform. Can you tell us how the Commission will adjust its Doha strategy in light of those Parliament positions on how you will take our position into account? I have a second question on the FTA with India as well. Since it now seems it will continue for the next year, will you have any new strategy, or any change in strategy, in case a conclusion cannot be reached by February? Are you just going to continue or are you going to come up with an alternative package?"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Franziska Keller (Verts/ALE )."1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph