Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-09-14-Speech-3-167-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-09-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fi"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110914.24.3-167-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-09-14-Speech-3-168-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Anneli Jäätteenmäki2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Suomen Keskusta (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; AFET (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2013-04-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; AFCO (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 vice-chair; ALDE (2009-07-14--2012-01-26)3 substitute; SEDE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, keynote addresses always stress the importance of transparency in the work of the EU. Unfortunately, the everyday reality is often different. The EU regulation on the transparency of documents lays down strict deadlines for handling documents. It is bewildering that not even the Commission keeps to these deadlines, which is evident, for example, from the Porsche case. In many cases, delays have resulted in the Court of Justice of the European Union starting to hear a case, and when a reply has been received from the Commission, the case has been abandoned, although it has cost money and people have gone to a lot of trouble over it. The EU’s regulation on transparency is being amended, but, unfortunately, this proposal by the Commission will take us in the opposite direction. Hopefully, there will be more transparency, because it is an important component of democracy."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph