Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-09-13-Speech-2-467-500"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20110913.34.2-467-500"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"This report exhibits the EU’s patronising attitudes in their purest form. It includes, amongst other things, plans for ‘special subsidies for women’, ‘women-friendly financial services’, ‘basic business courses for girls’ and an EU campaign ‘to promote women’s involvement in work’. These are misplaced proposals in each and every case, and the document talks women into an inferiority complex. In the document, the European Parliament even took the liberty of rapping the knuckles of specific countries (Poland) and mentioning the situation of specific groups such as the Roma.
At the same time, not a word is mentioned about the appalling position of a significant number of the female migrant population in Islamic circles. The Netherlands does not expect Brussels to meddle in social policy – that is a responsibility for the Member States themselves, not the EU. The Netherlands has been conducting its own emancipation policy with projects such as ‘programma Talent’ [Talent programme] and ‘eigen kracht’ [On your own two feet] for years. Seen from the European perspective, the Netherlands does a good job. This proposal is absurd in terms of content and completely superfluous. The Dutch Party for Freedom (PVV) is thus voting against the whole proposal."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples