Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-09-13-Speech-2-322-000"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20110913.34.2-322-000"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spoken text |
"I had some doubts about this proposal but, in the end, voted for it. Insofar as this agreement merely extends to Norway and Iceland – at the request of these two countries – provisions that are already in place among EU Member States, I see no reason to object. However, I am of the opinion that the European arrest warrant must be the object of an evaluation in order to respond to public concerns on possible abuses or defects of this instrument. In particular, I have concerns that the partial waiver on dual criminality may lead to problems.
This waiver, as framed by Article 3(4) of the agreement, creates the possibility of arrest and surrender for practices that do not constitute a crime in both countries concerned. A case in point is the possibility of waiving double-verification of criminality concerning ‘facilitation of unauthorised entry and residence’. I am of the opinion that the parties concerned should exercise restraint on such waivers of double-criminality verification in order to avoid arrests and surrenders for minor offences."@en1
|
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples