Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-09-13-Speech-2-302-500"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20110913.34.2-302-500"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"When negotiating the text, the EU also managed to obtain additional guarantees regarding the objection procedure. Unlike in other Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs), it is not enough for a party simply to object to a measure in order to circumvent its application. The objection procedure in this case is much more stringent, limiting the reasons that may give rise to an objection and, more importantly, obliging the State presenting an objection to adopt alternative measures that are equivalent in effect to the decision to which it has objected.
In the end, the text also seems to guarantee access for the vessels of one contracting party to the ports of other States that are party to the convention, which would at least open up access to Chile’s ports for the EU pelagic fleet. Finally, given the huge resistance by coastal states in this part of the world to applying international management measures inside their exclusive economic zone (EEZ), Ms Fraga Estévez considers that the points in favour of the convention outweigh those against. In any case, she stands by her position that the EU should have a presence within all RFMOs."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples