Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-07-06-Speech-3-285-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-07-06"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110706.18.3-285-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-07-06-Speech-3-285-5002
lpv:speaker	lp:Raül Romeva i Rueda2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Iniciativa per Catalunya Verds (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; PECH (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2009-09-16--2013-04-17)3,3 member; FEMM (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 vice-chair; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2012-01-31)3,3 substitute; LIBE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 member; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2009-09-16--2012-02-12)3,3
lpv:translated text	"The purpose of the proposal is to recast the rules on general food labelling provisions. It consolidates and updates two areas of labelling legislation: the area of general food law covered by Directive 2000/13/EC, and that of nutrition labelling covered by Directive 90/496/EEC. The dossier was affected by the extensive tabling of amendments at each stage of the process (up to 800) and two major groups within Parliament: the rapporteur (partly supported by ECR) and the ‘opposition’ in the form of S&D, Greens/EFA, GUE and partly ALDE. Ms Sommer’s draft report was substantially improved by Parliament. We supported the report both in plenary first reading and in ENVI second reading, as several of our key demands had been incorporated. The Council common position partly showed steps towards the Parliament position (e.g. country of origin), and, from a Green perspective, was better than the Parliament position on some issues (e.g. alcohol). The only ‘but’ is the inclusion of a text that says that Member States may stipulate that the particulars shall be given in one or more languages from among the official languages of the Union, which puts the non-official languages at risk."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Raül Romeva i Rueda (Verts/ALE ),"1 "in writing."1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph