Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-07-05-Speech-2-789-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-07-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Aviation security with a special focus on security scanners - Liquids (LAG) ban on aircrafts (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110705.42.2-789-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-07-05-Speech-2-790-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Eva Lichtenberger2
lpv:spokenAs	member; TRAN (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2011-12-12)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Die Grünen - Die Grüne Alternative (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; JURI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the debate on body scanners – which I shall continue to refer to as such, in order to distinguish these systems from baggage scanners – has only been this intensive, because it has attracted a great deal of public attention and because a number of Member States have pressed ahead and introduced equipment that many people simply see as an invasion of their privacy. The European Parliament has reacted correctly here and I thank the rapporteur for his open cooperation. Together we have done a good job and created a European regulation that also allows the Member States to opt out of using body scanners. We have managed to ensure that equipment that poses a particular health risk cannot be used, which means no X-ray scanners for any passengers. At the moment, we have a version which ensures that there are no body images that might crop up in public or be passed around among staff. There is no obligation to introduce these systems and data can be deleted quickly. I also set great store by well-trained airport staff, which is why I tabled an amendment on this subject. I believe that this is the very best security measure. As ever, the question of costs remains. We are still waiting for the Commission to find an appropriate solution. I must, of course, comment briefly on the question of liquids. We need prudent handling of the cost issue here, especially as the equipment does not identify what it is supposed to identify and costs a lot of money. The rule for freight scanners has finally been improved and included. That is only fair and it strikes a balance between the various sectors within the aviation industry."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph