Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-07-05-Speech-2-530-250"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-07-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110705.34.2-530-250"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-07-05-Speech-2-530-5002
lpv:speaker	lp:Ilda Figueiredo2
lpv:spokenAs	vice-chair; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2009-09-16--2012-01-17)3 unknown; Coligação Democrática Unitária (PCP-PEV) (2009-07-14--2012-01-17)3 vice-chair; EUL/NGL (2009-07-14--2012-01-17)3 vice-chair; EMPL (2009-07-16--2012-01-17)3 member; FEMM (2009-07-16--2012-01-17)3 substitute; ITRE (2009-07-16--2012-01-17)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2012-01-17)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Mercosur countries (2009-09-16--2012-01-17)3
lpv:translated text	"− We cannot accept the development of energy infrastructure on a market basis, which constitutes yet another step in the process of pursuing the third package on the internal energy market, as the report mentions. Its goal is to enable the free exchange of power on all transmission interconnectors between countries and/or different price areas: in other words, the liberalisation of the energy market. The development of energy infrastructure should be the responsibility of each Member State and as public property, thus contributing to a public energy supply service. However, the report runs counter to this, stating that public Union funds intended for supporting projects to develop infrastructure will be channelled into projects of European interest: in other words, those that contribute to creating the internal energy market, and to increasing integration, competition and market liquidity. Insistence on a policy of liberalising the private energy market has already shown itself to be extremely negative, whether because it increases unemployment and multiplies technical problems, or in terms of the price of energy for consumers, or because of its consequences on increasing energy poverty, or in terms of the increasing energy dependence of some Member States. That is why we voted against the report."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph