Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-07-05-Speech-2-498-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-07-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110705.34.2-498-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-07-05-Speech-2-498-1252
lpv:speaker	lp:Bas Belder2
lpv:spokenAs	chair; Delegation for relations with Israel (2009-09-17--2014-06-30)3 substitute; BUDG (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; AFET (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 chair_of_the_bureau; EFD (2011-05-23--2014-06-30)3 member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (2009-09-17--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with Iran (2009-09-16--2012-02-14)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (2009-12-07--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	". I voted against this report on post-2013 cohesion policy. The report does contain sound proposals in relation to improving the effectiveness of spending, for example with regard to cutting red tape, to financial control and to taking a more results-oriented approach to this policy through the use of pre-determined objectives and indicators. In my opinion, however, drawing up the line to be followed in future could also have been the opportunity to critically examine whether the financial flows in question actually need to go via the EU. I take the view that the cohesion policy and its funds should be restricted to the poorest regions in the least prosperous Member States and that the rich Member States should not, in principle, be considered for these funds (with the exception of projects under Objective 3, where EU activity has added value in terms of bringing about transnational territorial cooperation). Slimming down the policy in this way would mean that the contributions from the richer Member States would be reduced. They would then be able to invest the money saved in areas in their own countries that demand extra attention, without these money flows having to go via the EU."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph