Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-07-05-Speech-2-316-500"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-07-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"da"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110705.34.2-316-500"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-07-05-Speech-2-316-7502
lpv:speaker	lp:Søren Bo Søndergaard2
lpv:spokenAs	member; AFCO (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2014-02-04)3 substitute; IMCO (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Switzerland and Norway and to the EU-Iceland Joint Parliamentary Committee and the European Economic Area (EEA) Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-02-04)3 unknown; Folkebevægelsen mod EU (2009-07-14--2014-02-04)3 member; CONT (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (2009-07-14--2014-02-04)3
lpv:translated text	"I voted in favour of the report in respect of those workers who were promised retraining and further training in connection with the mass redundancies at LM Glasfiber. My vote does not mean that I support the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund. On the contrary, I believe that the EU’s subsidy system, whereby rich EU countries give money to the EU so that the EU can then give money back to them, is absurd. Everyone knows that the longer someone is out of work, the harder it becomes to find work again. Nevertheless, it takes months – even after approval has been granted – before the money from the EU’s Globalisation Adjustment Fund is paid out. If this money had been paid out straight away by the Danish State without it having to do a circuit around Brussels, it would have been worth a lot more than it is now."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph