Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-07-05-Speech-2-274-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-07-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110705.34.2-274-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-07-05-Speech-2-274-5002
lpv:speaker	lp:Mara Bizzotto2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; PETI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; EMPL (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (2009-09-30--2014-06-30)3 chair; Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand (2009-09-30--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Lega Nord (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Canada (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; LIBE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; EFD (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"− The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) is an instrument intended to assist in the reintegration of workers who have lost their job due to the ongoing globalisation of world markets. The fund is for workers and does not aim to benefit the business that made the redundancies in any way. In terms of mobilising the fund for the case in question, I abstained in the vote because I think it presented some critical issues and the eligibility of the request was not all that clear. Indeed, even though the Commission had approved the request, some aspects made me to lean towards abstaining. For instance, it was not a surprise that the workers were made redundant, given that almost a year had passed since the announcement of the closure of the site to the request to mobilise the fund. Furthermore, 750 of the 950 workers who would have been targeted for assistance from the fund had already been hired by a Norwegian firm for offshore activities."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph