Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-06-23-Speech-4-600-500"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20110623.37.4-600-500"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spoken text |
"The ECR supported this report because it is a significant improvement on the Commission communication and keeps the spirit of previous market-based reforms alive. It also focuses on the challenge of greening the CAP through primarily rural development measures. However, the ECR does not support the capping of payments to large farms or proposals to extend market intervention to other sectors. We believe that these will institutionalise inefficiencies in the farming sector. We therefore supported all amendments opposing capping. In general, the Deß report is more positive than the Commission proposal. The Commission proposal includes greening of payments in Pillar 1, the reintroduction of set-aside, a focus on social policy and an increase in the role of Article 68, which allows for the reintroduction of coupled payments in some sectors. These are all backward steps which will further complicate the CAP and do nothing to help farmers respond to market forces. Although the Deß report includes weaker elements of some of these proposals, unlike the Commission communication, it does not undermine the pro-market direction of travel of previous reforms. The ECR group therefore supported the final report, although we do not support all the provisions contained in it."@en1
|
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples