Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-06-23-Speech-4-502-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-06-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110623.37.4-502-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-06-23-Speech-4-502-5002
lpv:speaker	lp:Aldo Patriciello2
lpv:spokenAs	member; CONT (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; ITRE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; REGI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Armenia, EU-Azerbaijan and EU-Georgia Parliamentary Cooperation Committees (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Il Popolo della Libertà (2009-07-14--2013-12-05)3 member; Delegation for relations with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro and Kosovo (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"− Economic governance and national economic policy should be more a matter of common concern for all the parties involved. The Commission’s proposals for improved economic governance are of major importance for the future of the European Union. They may be a good starting point, but they need to be further developed. The points to be further developed are: a stronger focus on prevention of unsustainable fiscal and macroeconomic policies; the need for national reform programmes and stability and convergence programmes to be duly dealt with at national level before submission to EU-level surveillance; a stronger and more independent role for the Commission in the surveillance procedure; more independence for the Commission in relation to the Council concerning compliance with EU rules; the need for the decision-making procedure based on reversed qualified majority voting in the Council to be introduced in both the preventive and the corrective parts of the framework; enhanced transparency and accountability, in order to strengthen peer support and peer pressure; a more independent role for the Commission in the decision-making procedure but also greater accountability on the part of the Commission; and lastly, the need for Parliament to have a stronger role in the surveillance process, but not an executive role. For these reasons, I voted in favour."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph