Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-06-09-Speech-4-164-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-06-09"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fi"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110609.12.4-164-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-06-09-Speech-4-165-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Anneli Jäätteenmäki2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Suomen Keskusta (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; AFET (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2013-04-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; AFCO (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 vice-chair; ALDE (2009-07-14--2012-01-26)3 substitute; SEDE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, Russia is an important partner of the EU, and the EU would get even more out of its relations with Russia if the approach were genuinely strategic and sufficiently assertive between summits. Only then would we achieve results. There are three issues to consider. Firstly, there is Russia’s membership of the World Trade Organisation. Russia’s WTO membership and free trade are in the interests of both the EU and Russia. Developments in the investment climate and the rule of law are essential components in Russia’s forward development. Secondly, the EU and Russia have a common interest in the Arctic region, and that interest is important. The EU needs to strengthen its Arctic policy. Thirdly, visa waiver between the EU and Russia is the right goal. Russia, however, should improve its border controls and practices significantly and, in this respect, I support this very practical approach."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(Applause)"1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph