Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-06-08-Speech-3-622-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-06-08"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:European Arrest Warrant (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110608.25.3-622-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-06-08-Speech-3-623-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Birgit Sippel2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with Canada (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; LIBE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; EMPL (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 unknown; Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Iraq (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	". I am not sure whether I should answer your question, as it is more of a polemic comment. However, the figures show that the European Arrest Warrant is an appropriate instrument for fighting crime in the unified space of Europe. Crime is not national; crime is international and crosses borders. That is why we need to cooperate across borders. We need to deal with the teething problems of the European Arrest Warrant and stop it being misused. As an instrument, however, it is indispensable."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph