Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-06-07-Speech-2-425-000"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20110607.26.2-425-000"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spoken text |
"Question 20 by Anne E. Jensen ()
At the end of June 2011, the Commission will present its proposal for the next 7-year budgetary framework (2014-2020). In the case of EU regional policy, there have been substantial problems with absorption capacity under the individual programmes. Several programmes have also failed to achieve their objectives.
How does the Commission intend to include the absorption capacity of each Member State as a criterion for the allocation of structural fund appropriations in the coming budgetary period?
Does the Commission agree that payments should be reviewed if a region has been receiving structural funding for years without this resulting in it meeting the targets set?
Will the Commission consider a ‘sunset mechanism’ that sets a closing date on the allocation of structural fund appropriations to individual recipient regions? Does the Commission agree that such a mechanism would help create a more results-oriented cohesion policy?
The Court of Auditors Annual Report for 2009 found the highest error rate to be in payments under the EU’s cohesion policy. This was the same finding as in previous years. How does the Commission intend to remedy this situation?"@en1
|
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
"Subject: Fulfilment of the objectives of structural funds payments"1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples