Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-03-23-Speech-3-275-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-03-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Implementation of the Fuel Quality Directive (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"fi"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110323.22.3-275-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-03-23-Speech-3-276-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Satu Hassi2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; ITRE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; ENVI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with India (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Vihreä liitto (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, as part of the climate package, we decided that the carbon footprint of transport fuel should decrease by 6% by 2020. It would be completely inconsistent and senseless if we now turned a blind eye to the dirtiest fuels of all, like oil from oil sand, at the same time encouraging their production around the world, in Canada and Africa, for example. It is quite obvious that we should have our own default values for the carbon footprint of oil from oil sand and oil shale. We also need to differentiate the other sources of crude oil as soon as possible. In my view, the Canadian Government has very inappropriately put pressure on the EU, and we should not give way to it. If Canada’s footprint from tar sands oil is lower than the reference value, Canada can prove it. Should we not adhere to the same principle with fossil oil as we do with biofuels, which is that the default values are differentiated according to the source of the raw materials?"@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph