Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-03-23-Speech-3-209-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: none)
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; ALDE (2009-07-20--2014-06-30)3
lpv:spokenAs	member; FEMM (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Democraten 66 (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; ECON (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:spokenAs	vice-chair; LIBE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:spoken text	"Mr President, I would like to thank the Council and the Commission. I am pleased to note that they share our concern. Let us be very clear: I do not think anybody here is claiming that the US was acting outside its jurisdiction. That is not the problem. The problem is that its jurisdiction, through the internet, becomes extremely vast. Its jurisdiction seems to extend even into the European Union, because the problem here is that although the vast majority of the internet-based companies we are talking about are based in the US, many of the users are based in the European Union. I should point out that this oral question is already a bit out of date, as there has been another court ruling in the meantime, but the argument that is being used by the American courts is that once you use Twitter, as in this case, you cannot have a legitimate expectation of privacy any more. That means that anybody based in the European Union – EU citizens – no longer have any legal protection, because Twitter is US-based. As Commissioner Reding pointed out, that is a huge problem that must be addressed in the context of the review of the Data Protection Directive. Commissioner, you say that once someone has used Twitter they have given consent, but what does ‘consent’ really mean? It means that we become outlaws, that we abandon our rights to legal protection. I realise there is very little that we can do here, but I would like to ask what the Commission and the Council will do to provide legal protection to EU citizens. Will they talk to our American counterparts and try and get more information? There are probably other companies that have been subpoenaed. Finally, you say, Commissioner, that this case cannot be compared to SWIFT because it concerns a very specific investigation, which is true. At the same time, they have requested large amounts of …"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(The President cut off the speaker)"1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Sophia in 't Veld,"1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"on behalf of the ALDE Group."1
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-03-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:US subpoenas and EU data protection rules (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-03-23-Speech-3-210-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Sophia in 't Veld2
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110323.20.3-209-000"2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph