Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-03-09-Speech-3-226-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-03-09"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110309.19.3-226-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-03-09-Speech-3-230-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Nathalie Griesbeck2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with the Mercosur countries (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; LIBE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; TRAN (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; ALDE (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Mouvement Démocrate (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"We voted this week on the European Parliament’s calendar of part-sessions for 2012 and 2013. To my great regret, a majority of MEPs voted in favour of an amendment (to which I was strongly opposed) merging the two October part-sessions into one, in the same week. As far as I am concerned, this vote completely contradicts the spirit of the EU Treaties, which explicitly state that Strasbourg shall be the seat of the European Parliament and that 12 part-sessions shall be held there annually. The debate on the location of the European Parliament’s seat resurfaces all the time, and this is a fresh attack today on the European Parliament’s seat in Strasbourg. However, the Strasbourg seat has historical references and is referred to in legal texts, and it should not be called into question by these multiple attacks. France recently announced that it was referring the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Union, a move which I would like to applaud and which I will support."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph