Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-02-15-Speech-2-371-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-02-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110215.22.2-371-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-02-15-Speech-2-372-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Adam Gierek2
lpv:spokenAs	member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; ITRE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; ENVI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Unia Pracy (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"The European patent is supposed to help us boost innovation, yet why can we not manage to be innovative ourselves when debating it? We should be ashamed of ourselves. We talk of nothing but patent law; let us also talk about establishing an optimum form for patents. We currently have short and long patents, yet it is not necessarily the case at all that the latter are better written. The description is frequently made more complex on purpose in order to obscure and complicate the form of the patent. I think that we need to create a transparent form for patents and a procedure for describing them, so that the Internet and electronic recording methods can be put to good use. Language is a related issue, and a set algorithm could be used to solve this problem. I think that the cheapest method, which would not require translations into different languages, would be a European e-patent. Maybe the Commission will start to think innovatively. I voted in favour, although I believe that the Commission is showing too little initiative on this matter."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph