Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-02-14-Speech-1-163-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-02-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Implementation of the EU strategy for the Danube region (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"cs"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110214.17.1-163-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-02-14-Speech-1-164-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Oldřich Vlasák2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; TRAN (2009-09-09--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Mercosur countries (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Občanská demokratická strana (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; REGI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; PECH (2009-07-14--2012-01-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, the macro-regional strategies are, first and foremost, a political instrument representing one of the possible forms of regional cooperation. They should serve as an instrument for the effective exploitation of existing initiatives, programmes, financial instruments, cooperation platforms and institutions. The macro-regional strategies should also provide a framework for the better functioning of the Union and its internal market, as well as a platform for corporate networking. They should assist in the rationalisation and better structuring of access to tenders, which is an issue confronting Europe’s larger cross-border geographical units. However, both tenders and instruments must be clearly defined. From the perspective of our group, the Group of European Conservatives and Reformists, it is vitally important for the concept of macro-regional strategies at the EU level to be resolved in a structured and systematic way in relation to other policies. It is therefore desirable to select a strategic approach to this issue, particularly regarding the number of strategies, and the concentration and nature of the projects and administration. We support the concept of macro-regional strategies, including the Danube one, on condition that the Council will continue to observe the approved principles (the ‘3 neutralities’): budgetary and financial neutrality, legislative neutrality and institutional neutrality. The role and future of macro-regional strategies may be related to the debate over the future use of European funds, although in our view, it is unnecessary for today’s debate to extend into a discussion on the future architecture of the cohesion policy and the anticipation of potential financial allocations designated for individual states in the coming financial perspective. The macro-regional strategies should not have an influence on the future architecture of the cohesion policy, except for supra-national cooperation, or on financial allocation for individual objectives."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph