Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-02-03-Speech-4-262-000"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20110203.25.4-262-000"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"I voted in favour of this report,, for similar reasons as I did for the preceding report,. Both cases concern a dispute over the full implementation of the Treaty of Lisbon. Indeed, at this time of legal transition Parliament cannot and must not miss out on the powers vested in it by the Treaty of Lisbon. Indeed, the central aspect of the legislative recommendation proposed by the rapporteur in this process does not concern the substance of the Financing Instrument for Development Cooperation Regulation. Its main objective is to protect Parliament’s democratic prerogatives, as provided for in the Treaty.
In its capacity as a co-legislator, Parliament should be able to monitor the adoption of strategic decisions about where and how development aid is spent, on an equal footing with the Council. To this end, the rapporteur believes that in technical terms a number of decisions, which are normally taken by the Commission for the execution of the basic act, fulfil the criteria for being considered ‘delegated acts’, pursuant to Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. This would provide the two legislative bodies with a real opportunity to object to certain draft decisions proposed by the Commission, or even to revoke the delegation."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples