Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-02-03-Speech-4-086-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-02-03"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Waste electrical and electronic equipment (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"cs"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110203.5.4-086-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-02-03-Speech-4-087-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Jaromír Kohlíček2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; AFET (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 unknown; Komunistická strana Čech a Moravy (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; TRAN (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan and EU-Uzbekistan Parliamentary Cooperation Committees, and for relations with Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Mongolia (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; EUL/NGL (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"The collection of electrical and electronic waste is a very topical issue at present. It is therefore highly necessary to update the directive covering this area. In my opinion, some of the amendments that will be voted on in the introductory block represent a very poor way of combining Commission proposals with the other proposals for facilitating the collection, sorting and recycling of the waste. On the contrary, even if they do not bring chaos to this issue, they do bring less light. Unfortunately, there is not much we can do at this stage of the issue in the final vote. It is interesting that the representatives of most political groups agree on many of the relatively decent amendments. If this agreement translates into support in the final vote, the resulting directive may support a dramatic increase in the collection of electrical and electronic equipment, as well as equipment that is easier to process. One of the key points is Article 14, paragraph 1, which – as long as Amendment 91 or the rather less clear formulation of Amendment 103 is adopted – could support the recycling and collection of electrical and electronic equipment. It is important for the overall effort to result in a directive that will clearly set out the obligations of the various bodies, while at the same time enabling the recycling process to be as effective as possible. From this perspective, the bizarre idea of sorting lighting equipment into several categories is not desirable, nor is the excessive number of exemptions for the entire category of large equipment."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"CS)"1 "Jaromír Kohlíček (GUE/NGL ),"1 "in writing."1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph