Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-02-03-Speech-4-076-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-02-03"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Waste electrical and electronic equipment (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110203.5.4-076-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-02-03-Speech-4-077-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Elisabetta Gardini2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; LIBE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 member; ENVI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 unknown; Il Popolo della Libertà (2009-07-14--2013-12-16)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, I agree with much of what I have heard. I think this is an important, fundamental directive, and so we will of course vote for it. I am also convinced, however, that we need more detail on certain aspects and I hope that will be possible at second reading. For example, I expect the Commission to carry out an impact assessment concerning the open scope of the directive because, although in theory it might appear to respect the environment more, I think it could give rise to problems at a practical level. Based on experience with the current directive, a closed scope gives greater certainty and makes the legislation easier to implement. There are other aspects as well, in addition to this impact assessment. I think we have to be careful to ease the burden for producers, distributors and retailers. It is right that they should be involved and made to accept responsibility, but we must be careful not to overburden them, not least in terms of administrative requirements. I think the instruments and criteria need to be adjusted to take the various national systems into account. Member States are not just good or bad. As we have heard and as we have already appraised – although I think we need to go into this area as well in greater depth – there are different systems and different circumstances in the Member States, which need to be carefully assessed so that no countries automatically benefit while others automatically lose out. We are therefore in favour of this directive, but we need more time and greater detail."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph