Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-01-18-Speech-2-372-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-01-18"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Hour with the President of the Commission2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110118.18.2-372-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-01-18-Speech-2-373-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Rebecca Harms2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; ITRE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 unknown; Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; ENVI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 co-chair; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Conference of Presidents (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"In Russia, freedom of the press and of the media is a really major problem. If you want to come out of this debate well, Mr Barroso, you cannot tolerate what is taking place at the moment in Hungary. I would like to ask you why the Commission is being so lax about Hungary’s Media Act. In every area, it violates principles that apply in Europe and beyond. We sought expert legal advice. In summary, the advice is that the Act violates the Copenhagen criteria, the Helsinki Final Act, the Audiovisual Media Services Directive, the European Convention on Human Rights, the UNESCO Convention, which does cover the media, the Treaty of Lisbon and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. I could continue, but I will stop there. I would like to ask you, therefore, when will you intervene in Hungary appropriately? What is the timetable? Why have there still not been any infringement proceedings? My criticism is also backed up by existing jurisprudence in this field."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph