Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-12-15-Speech-3-931"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-12-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"ro"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20101215.23.3-931"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-12-15-Speech-3-9302
lpv:speaker	lp:Rovana Plumb2
lpv:spokenAs	member; EMPL (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; ENVI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2010-05-04--2012-05-06)3 substitute; FEMM (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 unknown; Partidul Social Democrat (2009-07-14--2012-05-06)3 member; S&D (2009-07-14--2011-05-25)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2012-05-06)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2012-05-06)3
lpv:translated text	". Repealing all eight directives will most likely lead to additional administrative burdens as Members States will be able to introduce national provisions implementing the measuring instruments covered by the directives being repealed. Neither the directives being repealed nor those remaining in force will enhance the common level of consumer protection. This could only be achieved by amending them. I think that Member States should be given more time to investigate whether repealing the directives would lead to legal uncertainty which would make the harmonisation of European rules necessary. I also support the rapporteur’s proposal for the process to be completed by 1 May 2014. Consequently, I voted for this report as it opts for a solution where the directives will be repealed, but also provides sufficient time to analyse the possible consequences in the context of the broad review of the basic legal instrument in this field, the Measurement Instruments Directive (2004/22/EC)."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph