Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-11-24-Speech-3-525"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-11-24"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Anti-dumping cases - state of play and prospects (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20101124.27.3-525"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-11-24-Speech-3-5262
lpv:speaker	lp:Cristiana Muscardini2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with Iraq (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Il Popolo della Libertà (2009-07-14--2011-02-06)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan and EU-Uzbekistan Parliamentary Cooperation Committees, and for relations with Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Mongolia (2009-09-16--2012-10-14)3 substitute; ENVI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 vice-chair; INTA (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the Cariforum — EU Parliamentary Committee (2010-06-16--2012-10-14)3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2012-10-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, anti-dumping represents one of the most incisive instruments for defending commercial decency in the European Union in order to compete fairly on the market. It needs clear and enforceable rules within the new comitology. The Treaty of Lisbon clearly states that the Commission is responsible for executive acts. The Council and Parliament have the power to monitor the work of the Commission. The compromise under examination today removes the role assigned to Parliament by the Treaty of Lisbon and could therefore create a new democratic deficit within the institutions. In detail, we do not understand and we reject the proposal to apply differential treatment to anti-dumping measures, which introduces elements of discretional decision making, politicisation and legal uncertainty to proceedings, which should instead aim to protect the legitimate interests of businesses damaged by practices of unfair competition. At a time of serious economic crisis like the present, it seems unreasonable and masochistic to make the conclusion of anti-dumping procedures complicated and perhaps impractical. Indeed, that would be the result of the current proposal if it were not amended. We appeal to the Member States’ sense of responsibility, as well as to that of the Commission, since their common interest must be to guarantee greater development. Development is only possible in the presence of rules that prevent market distortion, respect institutional roles and make procedures swift."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph